US and China at odds over N Korea cargo
The US insisted on Monday on the right to intercept suspicious North Korean cargo under the authority of the UN Security Council resolution passed on Saturday, setting the stage for a difficult trip to Asia for Condoleezza Rice this week.
As the US secretary of state prepared to leave for talks in Japan, China, South Korea and Russia, US intelligence said air samples it had collected confirmed North Korea’s claim to have carried out an underground nuclear test last Monday.
ADVERTISEMENT
Describing resolution 1718 passed unanimously as “a very powerful tool”, Ms Rice said it made possible the “interdiction of dangerous and suspicious cargo”.
“We expect every member of the international community to fully implement all aspects of this resolution and we expect the Security Council to aggressively monitor the process,” she said.
However, Wang Guangya, China’s ambassador to the UN, disagreed, telling reporters: “Inspections yes, but inspections are different from interception and interdiction.”
He said the resolution did not make it mandatory for all nations to inspect cargo going to and from North Korea. States could carry out such an operation as necessary “in accordance with their national legal authorities”, he said.
Kim Holmes, a former senior US official who dealt with North Korea and the UN and is now vice-president of the conservative Heritage Foundation in Washington, appeared to concur with the Chinese interpretation, saying the resolution did not approve the use of force needed for interdiction. The resolution speaks of inspection, not interdiction.
China had succeeded in watering down the resolution in a week of debate, by insisting that inspections also required the “co-operation” of North Korea, Mr Holmes said.
Ms Rice said she would discuss how to design “a practical architecture for detecting and screening” dangerous materials.
Dismissing the notion of differences with China, she said: “I am not concerned that the Chinese are going to turn their backs on their obligations. I don’t think they would have voted for a resolution that they did not intend to carry through on.”
China had already started checking North Korean trucks crossing its border, Nicholas Burns, under-secretary of state, commented.
Ms Rice repeated that the US was ready to hold talks with North Korea if it returned to the six-party forum mediated by China.
“My goal on this trip is, certainly, to reiterate that we’re prepared to return to the talks. But North Korea also needs to understand?.?.?.? that they will pay a price here,” she said.
North Korea becomes the ninth state believed to possess a nuclear weapon, although it is not widely thought to have perfected the process needed to deliver one by missile.
Iran as a potential customer of nuclear materials is the Bush administration’s greatest concern. Senior US officials are visiting Gulf allies this week to prepare for naval exercises testing their joint ability to intercept North Korean ships bound for Iran.
“The Iranian government is watching and it can now see that the international community will respond to threats from nuclear proliferation,” Ms Rice told reporters.
Later this week the US is expected to table a draft Security Council resolution that seeks to impose sanctions on Iran for rejecting a UN demand that it suspend its nuclear fuel cycle programme. US officials said they expect tough negotiations with China and Russia.
Yasuhisa Shiozaki, chief cabinet secretary, said Monday Japan had no plans to change its ban on nuclear weapons. Thomas Schieffer, US ambassador to Japan, said that, as long as Japan believed the US remained prepared to “trade New York for Tokyo”, an independent nuclear deterrent would not make it any safer. “This is not a new situation for Japan. We have been here for 50 years.”
Australia