Section: 295 Heading: Offence of false trading Version Date: 01/04/2003
Division 3-Other market misconduct offences
(1) A person shall not, in Hong Kong or elsewhere, do anything or cause anything to be done, with the intention that, or being reckless as to whether, it has, or is likely to have, the effect of creating a false or misleading appearance-
(a) of active trading in securities or futures contracts traded on a relevant recognized market or by means of authorized automated trading services; or
(b) with respect to the market for, or the price for dealings in, securities or futures contracts traded on a relevant recognized market or by means of authorized automated trading services.
(2) A person shall not, in Hong Kong, do anything or cause anything to be done, with the intention that, or being reckless as to whether, it has, or is likely to have, the effect of creating a false or misleading appearance-
(a) of active trading in securities or futures contracts traded on a relevant overseas market; or
(b) with respect to the market for, or the price for dealings in, securities or futures contracts traded on a relevant overseas market.
(3) A person shall not, in Hong Kong or elsewhere, take part in, be concerned in, or carry out, directly or indirectly, one or more transactions (whether or not any of them is a dealing in securities or futures contracts), with the intention that, or being reckless as to whether, it or they has or have, or is or are likely to have, the effect of creating an artificial price, or maintaining at a level that is artificial (whether or not it was previously artificial) a price, for dealings in securities or futures contracts traded on a relevant recognized market or by means of authorized automated trading services.
(4) A person shall not, in Hong Kong, take part in, be concerned in, or carry out, directly or indirectly, one or more transactions (whether or not any of them is a dealing in securities or futures contracts), with the intention that, or being reckless as to whether, it or they has or have, or is or are likely to have, the effect of creating an artificial price, or maintaining at a level that is artificial (whether or not it was previously artificial) a price, for dealings in securities or futures contracts traded on a relevant overseas market.
(5) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1) or (2), where a person-
(a) enters into or carries out, directly or indirectly, any transaction of sale or purchase, or any transaction which purports to be a transaction of sale or purchase, of securities that does not involve a change in the beneficial ownership of them;
(b) offers to sell securities at a price that is substantially the same as the price at which he has made or proposes to make, or knows that an associate of his has made or proposes to make, an offer to purchase the same or substantially the same number of them; or
(c) offers to purchase securities at a price that is substantially the same as the price at which he has made or proposes to make, or knows that an associate of his has made or proposes to make, an offer to sell the same or substantially the same number of them,
then, unless the transaction in question is an off-market transaction, the person shall, for the purposes of subsections (1) and (2), be regarded as doing something or causing something to be done, with the intention that, or being reckless as to whether, it has, or is likely to have, the effect of creating a false or misleading appearance-
(i) where the securities are traded on a relevant recognized market or by means of authorized automated trading services, of active trading in securities so traded or with respect to the market for, or the price for dealings in, securities so traded; or
(ii) where the securities are traded on a relevant overseas market, of active trading in securities so traded or with respect to the market for, or the price for dealings in, securities so traded.
(6) Subject to subsection (7), a person who contravenes subsection (1), (2), (3) or (4) commits an offence.
(7) Where a person is charged with an offence under subsection (6) in respect of a contravention of subsection (1) or (2) taking place through the commission of an act referred to in subsection (5)(a), (b) or (c), it is a defence to the charge for the person to prove that the purpose for which he committed the act was not, or, where there was more than one purpose, the purposes for which he committed the act did not include, the purpose of creating a false or misleading appearance of active trading in securities, or with respect to the market for, or the price for dealings in, securities, referred to in subsection (1) or (2) (as the case may be).
(8) In subsection (5), "off-market transaction" (场外交易) means a transaction which-
(a) in the case of securities traded on a relevant recognized market, is not required to be recorded on the relevant recognized market, or to be notified, under the rules of the person by whom the relevant recognized market is operated, to such person;
(b) in the case of securities traded by means of authorized automated trading services, is not required to be recorded by means of authorized automated trading services, or to be notified, under the rules of the person by whom the authorized automated trading services are operated, to such person; or
(c) in the case of securities traded on a relevant overseas market, is not required to be recorded on the relevant overseas market, or to be notified, under the rules of the person by whom the relevant overseas market is operated, to such person.
(9) In this section-
(a) a reference to a transaction of sale or purchase, in relation to securities, includes an offer to sell or purchase securities and an invitation (however expressed) that expressly or impliedly invites a person to offer to sell or purchase securities; and
(b) a reference to entering into or carrying out a transaction of sale or purchase shall, in the case of an offer or an invitation referred to in paragraph (a), be construed as a reference to making the offer or the invitation (as the case may be).
Section: 296 Heading: Offence of price rigging Version Date: 01/04/2003
(1) A person shall not, in Hong Kong or elsewhere-
(a) enter into or carry out, directly or indirectly, any transaction of sale or purchase of securities that does not involve a change in the beneficial ownership of those securities, which has the effect of maintaining, increasing, reducing, stabilizing, or causing fluctuations in, the price of securities traded on a relevant recognized market or by means of authorized automated trading services; or
(b) enter into or carry out, directly or indirectly, any fictitious or artificial transaction or device, with the intention that, or being reckless as to whether, it has the effect of maintaining, increasing, reducing, stabilizing, or causing fluctuations in, the price of securities, or the price for dealings in futures contracts, that are traded on a relevant recognized market or by means of authorized automated trading services.
(2) A person shall not, in Hong Kong-
(a) enter into or carry out, directly or indirectly, any transaction of sale or purchase of securities that does not involve a change in the beneficial ownership of those securities, which has the effect of maintaining, increasing, reducing, stabilizing, or causing fluctuations in, the price of securities traded on a relevant overseas market; or
(b) enter into or carry out, directly or indirectly, any fictitious or artificial transaction or device, with the intention that, or being reckless as to whether, it has the effect of maintaining, increasing, reducing, stabilizing, or causing fluctuations in, the price of securities, or the price for dealings in futures contracts, that are traded on a relevant overseas market.
(3) For the purposes of subsections (1)(b) and (2)(b), the fact that a transaction is, or at any time was, intended to have effect according to its terms is not conclusive in determining whether the transaction is, or was, not fictitious or artificial.
(4) Subject to subsection (5), a person who contravenes subsection (1) or (2) commits an offence.
(5) Where a person is charged with an offence under subsection (4) in respect of a contravention of subsection (1)(a) or (2)(a) taking place through any transaction of sale or purchase of securities, it is a defence to the charge for the person to prove that the purpose for which the securities were sold or purchased was not, or, where there was more than one purpose, the purposes for which the securities were sold or purchased did not include, the purpose of creating a false or misleading appearance with respect to the price of securities.
(6) In this section-
(a) a reference to a transaction of sale or purchase, in relation to securities, includes an offer to sell or purchase securities and an invitation (however expressed) that expressly or impliedly invites a person to offer to sell or purchase securities; and
(b) a reference to entering into or carrying out a transaction of sale or purchase shall, in the case of an offer or an invitation referred to in paragraph (a), be construed as a reference to making the offer or the invitation (as the case may be).
Section: 297 Heading: Offence of disclosure of information about prohibited transactions Version Date: 01/04/2003
(1) A person shall not disclose, circulate or disseminate, or authorize or be concerned in the disclosure, circulation or dissemination of, information to the effect that the price of securities of a corporation, or the price for dealings in futures contracts, that are traded on a relevant recognized market or by means of authorized automated trading services will be maintained, increased, reduced or stabilized, or is likely to be maintained, increased, reduced or stabilized, because of a prohibited transaction relating to securities of either the corporation or a related corporation of the corporation or to the futures contracts (as the case may be), if he, or an associate of his-
(a) has entered into or carried out, directly or indirectly, the prohibited transaction; or
(b) has received, or expects to receive, directly or indirectly, a benefit as a result of the disclosure, circulation or dissemination of the information.
(2) Subject to subsection (3), a person who contravenes subsection (1) commits an offence.
(3) Where a person is charged with an offence under subsection (2) in respect of a contravention of subsection (1) on the basis that he, or an associate of his, received, or expected to receive, directly or indirectly, a benefit referred to in subsection (1)(b), it is a defence to the charge for the person to prove that-
(a) the benefit which he or the associate of his (as the case may be) received, or expected to receive, was not from a person who has entered into or carried out, directly or indirectly, the prohibited transaction in question, or an associate of such person; or
(b) the benefit which he or the associate of his (as the case may be) received, or expected to receive, was from a person who has entered into or carried out, directly or indirectly, the prohibited transaction in question, or an associate of such person, but up to (and including) the time of the disclosure, circulation or dissemination of the information he has acted in good faith.
(4) In this section-
(a) a reference to a prohibited transaction means any conduct or transaction which constitutes market misconduct or a contravention of any of the provisions of Divisions 2 to 4; and
(b) a reference to any person having entered into or carried out the prohibited transaction shall be construed accordingly.
Section: 298 Heading: Offence of disclosure of false or misleading information inducing transactions Version Date: 01/04/2003
(1) A person shall not, in Hong Kong or elsewhere, disclose, circulate or disseminate, or authorize or be concerned in the disclosure, circulation or dissemination of, information that is likely-
(a) to induce another person to subscribe for securities, or deal in futures contracts, in Hong Kong;
(b) to induce the sale or purchase in Hong Kong of securities by another person; or
(c) to maintain, increase, reduce or stabilize the price of securities, or the price for dealings in futures contracts, in Hong Kong,
if-
(i) the information is false or misleading as to a material fact, or is false or misleading through the omission of a material fact; and
(ii) the person knows that, or is reckless as to whether, the information is false or misleading as to a material fact, or is false or misleading through the omission of a material fact.
(2) Subject to subsections (3) to (5), a person who contravenes subsection (1) commits an offence.
(3) Where a person is charged with an offence under subsection (2) in respect of a contravention of subsection (1) taking place by reason only of the issue or reproduction of information, it is a defence to the charge for the person to prove that-
(a) the issue or reproduction of the information took place in the ordinary course of a business (whether or not carried on by him), the principal purpose of which was issuing or reproducing materials provided by others;
(b) the contents of the information were not, wholly or partly, devised-
(i) where the business was carried on by him, by himself or any officer, employee or agent of his; or
(ii) where the business was not carried on by him, by himself;
(c) for the purposes of the issue or reproduction-
(i) where the business was carried on by him, he or any officer, employee or agent of his; or
(ii) where the business was not carried on by him, he,
did not select, add to, modify or otherwise exercise control over the contents of the information; and
(d) at the time of the issue or reproduction, he did not know that the information was false or misleading as to a material fact or was false or misleading through the omission of a material fact.
(4) Where a person is charged with an offence under subsection (2) in respect of a contravention of subsection (1) taking place by reason only of the re-transmission of information, it is a defence to the charge for the person to prove that-
(a) the re-transmission of the information took place in the ordinary course of a business (whether or not carried on by him), the normal conduct of which involved the re-transmission of information to other persons within an information system or from one information system to another information system (wherever situated), whether directly or by facilitating the establishment of links between such other persons and third parties;
(b) the contents of the information were not, wholly or partly, devised-
(i) where the business was carried on by him, by himself or any officer, employee or agent of his; or
(ii) where the business was not carried on by him, by himself;
(c) for the purposes of the re-transmission-
(i) where the business was carried on by him, he or any officer, employee or agent of his; or
(ii) where the business was not carried on by him, he,
did not select, add to, modify or otherwise exercise control over the contents of the information;
(d) the re-transmission of the information was accompanied by a message to the effect, or was effected following acknowledgment by the persons to whom it was re-transmitted of their understanding, that-
(i) where the business was carried on by him, he or any officer, employee or agent of his; or
(ii) where the business was not carried on by him, the person who carried on the business or any officer, employee or agent of that person,
did not devise the contents of the information, and neither took responsibility for it nor endorsed its accuracy; and
(e) at the time of the re-transmission-
(i) he did not know that the information was false or misleading as to a material fact or was false or misleading through the omission of a material fact; or
(ii) he knew that the information was false or misleading as to a material fact or was false or misleading through the omission of a material fact, but-
(A) where the business was carried on by him, in the circumstances of the case he could not reasonably be expected to prevent the re-transmission; or
(B) where the business was not carried on by him, in the circumstances of the case he has taken all reasonable steps to bring the fact that the information was so false or misleading to the attention of a person in a position to take steps to cause the re-transmission to be prevented (even if the re-transmission in fact took place).
(5) Where a person is charged with an offence under subsection (2) in respect of a contravention of subsection (1) taking place by reason only of the live broadcast of information, it is a defence to the charge for the person to prove that-
(a) the broadcast of the information took place in the ordinary course of the business of a broadcaster (whether or not he was such broadcaster);
(b) the contents of the information were not, wholly or partly, devised-
(i) where he was the broadcaster, by himself or any officer, employee or agent of his; or
(ii) where he was not the broadcaster, by himself;
(c) for the purposes of the broadcast-
(i) where he was the broadcaster, he or any officer, employee or agent of his; or
(ii) where he was not the broadcaster, he,
did not select, add to, modify or otherwise exercise control over the contents of the information;
(d) in relation to the broadcast-
(i) where he was the broadcaster, he; or
(ii) where he was not the broadcaster, he believed and had reasonable grounds to believe that the broadcaster,
acted in accordance with the terms and conditions of the licence (if any) by which he or the broadcaster (as the case may be) became entitled to broadcast as a broadcaster and with any code of practice or guidelines (however described) issued under or pursuant to the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap 106) or the Broadcasting Ordinance (Cap 562) and applicable to him or the broadcaster (as the case may be) as a broadcaster; and
(e) at the time of the broadcast-
(i) he did not know that the information was false or misleading as to a material fact or was false or misleading through the omission of a material fact; or
(ii) he knew that the information was false or misleading as to a material fact or was false or misleading through the omission of a material fact, but-
(A) where he was the broadcaster, in the circumstances of the case he could not reasonably be expected to prevent the broadcast; or
(B) where he was not the broadcaster, in the circumstances of the case he has taken all reasonable steps to bring the fact that the information was so false or misleading to the attention of a person in a position to take steps to cause the broadcast to be prevented (even if the broadcast in fact took place).
(6) In this section, "issue" (发出), in relation to any material (including any information), includes publishing, circulating, distributing or otherwise disseminating the material or the contents thereof, whether-
(a) by any visit in person;
(b) in a newspaper, magazine, journal or other publication;
(c) by the display of posters or notices;
(d) by means of circulars, brochures, pamphlets or handbills;
(e) by an exhibition of photographs or cinematograph films;
(f) by way of sound or television broadcasting;
(g) by any information system or other electronic device; or
(h) by any other means, whether mechanically, electronically, magnetically, optically, manually or by any other medium, or by way of production or transmission of light, image or sound or any other medium,
and also includes causing or authorizing the material to be issued.
Section: 299 Heading: Offence of stock market manipulation Version Date: 01/04/2003
(1) A person shall not, in Hong Kong or elsewhere-
(a) enter into or carry out, directly or indirectly, 2 or more transactions in securities of a corporation that by themselves or in conjunction with any other transaction increase, or are likely to increase, the price of any securities traded on a relevant recognized market or by means of authorized automated trading services, with the intention of inducing another person to purchase or subscribe for, or to refrain from selling, securities of the corporation or of a related corporation of the corporation;
(b) enter into or carry out, directly or indirectly, 2 or more transactions in securities of a corporation that by themselves or in conjunction with any other transaction reduce, or are likely to reduce, the price of any securities traded on a relevant recognized market or by means of authorized automated trading services, with the intention of inducing another person to sell, or to refrain from purchasing, securities of the corporation or of a related corporation of the corporation; or
(c) enter into or carry out, directly or indirectly, 2 or more transactions in securities of a corporation that by themselves or in conjunction with any other transaction maintain or stabilize, or are likely to maintain or stabilize, the price of any securities traded on a relevant recognized market or by means of authorized automated trading services, with the intention of inducing another person to sell, purchase or subscribe for, or to refrain from selling, purchasing or subscribing for, securities of the corporation or of a related corporation of the corporation.
(2) A person shall not, in Hong Kong-
(a) enter into or carry out, directly or indirectly, 2 or more transactions in securities of a corporation that by themselves or in conjunction with any other transaction increase, or are likely to increase, the price of any securities traded on a relevant overseas market, with the intention of inducing another person to purchase or subscribe for, or to refrain from selling, securities of the corporation or of a related corporation of the corporation;
(b) enter into or carry out, directly or indirectly, 2 or more transactions in securities of a corporation that by themselves or in conjunction with any other transaction reduce, or are likely to reduce, the price of any securities traded on a relevant overseas market, with the intention of inducing another person to sell, or to refrain from purchasing, securities of the corporation or of a related corporation of the corporation; or
(c) enter into or carry out, directly or indirectly, 2 or more transactions in securities of a corporation that by themselves or in conjunction with any other transaction maintain or stabilize, or are likely to maintain or stabilize, the price of any securities traded on a relevant overseas market, with the intention of inducing another person to sell, purchase or subscribe for, or to refrain from selling, purchasing or subscribing for, securities of the corporation or of a related corporation of the corporation.
(3) A person who contravenes subsection (1) or (2) commits an offence.
(4) In this section-
(a) a reference to a transaction includes an offer and an invitation (however expressed); and
(b) a reference to entering into or carrying out a transaction shall, in the case of an offer or an invitation referred to in paragraph (a), be construed as a reference to making the offer or the invitation (as the case may be).
Section: 300 Heading: Offence involving fraudulent or deceptive devices, etc. in transactions in securities, futures contracts or leveraged foreign exchange trading Version Date: 01/04/2003
Division 4-Other offences
(1) A person shall not, directly or indirectly, in a transaction involving securities, futures contracts or leveraged foreign exchange trading-
(a) employ any device, scheme or artifice with intent to defraud or deceive; or
(b) engage in any act, practice or course of business which is fraudulent or deceptive, or would operate as a fraud or deception.
(2) A person who contravenes subsection (1) commits an offence.
(3) In this section, a reference to a transaction includes an offer and an invitation (however expressed).
Section: 301 Heading: Offence of disclosure of false or misleading information inducing others to enter into leveraged foreign exchange contracts Version Date: 01/04/2003
(1) A person shall not, in Hong Kong or elsewhere, disclose, circulate or disseminate, or authorize or be concerned in the disclosure, circulation or dissemination of, information that is likely to induce another person to enter into a leveraged foreign exchange contract in Hong Kong, if-
(a) the information is false or misleading as to a material fact, or is false or misleading through the omission of a material fact; and
(b) the person knows that, or is reckless as to whether, the information is false or misleading as to a material fact, or is false or misleading through the omission of a material fact.
(2) Subject to subsections (3) to (5), a person who contravenes subsection (1) commits an offence.
(3) Where a person is charged with an offence under subsection (2) in respect of a contravention of subsection (1) taking place by reason only of the issue or reproduction of information, it is a defence to the charge for the person to prove that-
(a) the issue or reproduction of the information took place in the ordinary course of a business (whether or not carried on by him), the principal purpose of which was issuing or reproducing materials provided by others;
(b) the contents of the information were not, wholly or partly, devised-
(i) where the business was carried on by him, by himself or any officer, employee or agent of his; or
(ii) where the business was not carried on by him, by himself;
(c) for the purposes of the issue or reproduction-
(i) where the business was carried on by him, he or any officer, employee or agent of his; or
(ii) where the business was not carried on by him, he,
did not select, add to, modify or otherwise exercise control over the contents of the information; and
(d) at the time of the issue or reproduction, he did not know that the information was false or misleading as to a material fact or was false or misleading through the omission of a material fact.
(4) Where a person is charged with an offence under subsection (2) in respect of a contravention of subsection (1) taking place by reason only of the re-transmission of information, it is a defence to the charge for the person to prove that-
(a) the re-transmission of the information took place in the ordinary course of a business (whether or not carried on by him), the normal conduct of which involved the re-transmission of information to other persons within an information system or from one information system to another information system (wherever situated), whether directly or by facilitating the establishment of links between such other persons and third parties;
(b) the contents of the information were not, wholly or partly, devised-
(i) where the business was carried on by him, by himself or any officer, employee or agent of his; or
(ii) where the business was not carried on by him, by himself;
(c) for the purposes of the re-transmission-
(i) where the business was carried on by him, he or any officer, employee or agent of his; or
(ii) where the business was not carried on by him, he,
did not select, add to, modify or otherwise exercise control over the contents of the information;
(d) the re-transmission of the information was accompanied by a message to the effect, or was effected following acknowledgment by the persons to whom it was re-transmitted of their understanding, that-
(i) where the business was carried on by him, he or any officer, employee or agent of his; or
(ii) where the business was not carried on by him, the person who carried on the business or any officer, employee or agent of that person,
did not devise the contents of the information, and neither took responsibility for it nor endorsed its accuracy; and
(e) at the time of the re-transmission-
(i) he did not know that the information was false or misleading as to a material fact or was false or misleading through the omission of a material fact; or
(ii) he knew that the information was false or misleading as to a material fact or was false or misleading through the omission of a material fact, but-
(A) where the business was carried on by him, in the circumstances of the case he could not reasonably be expected to prevent the re-transmission; or
(B) where the business was not carried on by him, in the circumstances of the case he has taken all reasonable steps to bring the fact that the information was so false or misleading to the attention of a person in a position to take steps to cause the re-transmission to be prevented (even if the re-transmission in fact took place).
(5) Where a person is charged with an offence under subsection (2) in respect of a contravention of subsection (1) taking place by reason only of the live broadcast of information, it is a defence to the charge for the person to prove that-
(a) the broadcast of the information took place in the ordinary course of the business of a broadcaster (whether or not he was such broadcaster);
(b) the contents of the information were not, wholly or partly, devised-
(i) where he was the broadcaster, by himself or any officer, employee or agent of his; or
(ii) where he was not the broadcaster, by himself;
(c) for the purposes of the broadcast-
(i) where he was the broadcaster, he or any officer, employee or agent of his; or
(ii) where he was not the broadcaster, he,
did not select, add to, modify or otherwise exercise control over the contents of the information;
(d) in relation to the broadcast-
(i) where he was the broadcaster, he; or
(ii) where he was not the broadcaster, he believed and had reasonable grounds to believe that the broadcaster,
acted in accordance with the terms and conditions of the licence (if any) by which he or the broadcaster (as the case may be) became entitled to broadcast as a broadcaster and with any code of practice or guidelines (however described) issued under or pursuant to the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap 106) or the Broadcasting Ordinance (Cap 562) and applicable to him or the broadcaster (as the case may be) as a broadcaster; and
(e) at the time of the broadcast-
(i) he did not know that the information was false or misleading as to a material fact or was false or misleading through the omission of a material fact; or
(ii) he knew that the information was false or misleading as to a material fact or was false or misleading through the omission of a material fact, but-
(A) where he was the broadcaster, in the circumstances of the case he could not reasonably be expected to prevent the broadcast; or
(B) where he was not the broadcaster, in the circumstances of the case he has taken all reasonable steps to bring the fact that the information was so false or misleading to the attention of a person in a position to take steps to cause the broadcast to be prevented (even if the broadcast in fact took place).
(6) In this section, "issue" (发出), in relation to any material (including any information), includes publishing, circulating, distributing or otherwise disseminating the material or the contents thereof, whether-
(a) by any visit in person;
(b) in a newspaper, magazine, journal or other publication;
(c) by the display of posters or notices;
(d) by means of circulars, brochures, pamphlets or handbills;
(e) by an exhibition of photographs or cinematograph films;
(f) by way of sound or television broadcasting;
(g) by any information system or other electronic device; or
(h) by any other means, whether mechanically, electronically, magnetically, optically, manually or by any other medium, or by way of production or transmission of light, image or sound or any other medium,
and also includes causing or authorizing the material to be issued.
Section: 302 Heading: Offence of falsely representing dealings in futures contracts on behalf of others, etc. Version Date: 01/04/2003
(1) A person shall not represent to another person that he has on behalf of the other person dealt in, or facilitated or arranged for any dealing in, a futures contract traded on a recognized futures market or by means of authorized automated trading services, if-
(a) in fact he has not so dealt in, or facilitated or arranged for the dealing in, the futures contract; and
(b) he knows that, or is reckless as to whether, in fact he has not so dealt in, or facilitated or arranged for the dealing in, the futures contract.
(2) A person shall not represent to another person that he has dealt in, or facilitated or arranged for any dealing in, a contract or other instrument substantially resembling a futures contract on behalf of the other person in accordance with the rules of a futures market outside Hong Kong, if-
(a) in fact he has not so dealt in, or facilitated or arranged for the dealing in, the contract or other instrument; and
(b) he knows that, or is reckless as to whether, in fact he has not so dealt in, or facilitated or arranged for the dealing in, the contract or other instrument.
(3) A person who contravenes subsection (1) or (2) commits an offence.
Section: 303 Heading: Penalties Version Date: 01/04/2003
Division 5-Miscellaneous
(1) A person who commits an offence under this Part is liable-
(a) on conviction on indictment to a fine of $10000000 and to imprisonment for 10 years; or
(b) on summary conviction to a fine of $1000000 and to imprisonment for 3 years.
(2) Where a person is convicted of an offence under this Part, the court before which the person is so convicted may, in addition to any penalty specified in subsection (1), make one or more of the following orders in respect of the person-
(a) an order that the person shall not, without the leave of the court, be or continue to be a director, liquidator, or receiver or manager of the property or business, of a listed corporation or any other specified corporation or in any way, whether directly or indirectly, be concerned or take part in the management of a listed corporation or any other specified corporation for the period (not exceeding 5 years) specified in the order;
(b) an order that the person shall not, without the leave of the court, in Hong Kong, directly or indirectly, in any way acquire, dispose of or otherwise deal in any securities, futures contract or leveraged foreign exchange contract, or an interest in any securities, futures contract, leveraged foreign exchange contract or collective investment scheme for the period (not exceeding 5 years) specified in the order;
(c) an order that any body which may take disciplinary action against the person as one of its members be recommended to take disciplinary action against him.
(3) When making any order in respect of a person under subsection (2), the court may take into account any conduct by the person which-
(a) previously resulted in the person being convicted of an offence in Hong Kong;
(b) previously resulted in the person being identified by the Market Misconduct Tribunal as having engaged in any market misconduct pursuant to section 252(3)(b); or
(c) at any time before the commencement of Part XIII resulted in the person being identified as an insider dealer in a determination under section 16(3), or in a written report prepared and issued under section 22(1), of the repealed Securities (Insider Dealing) Ordinance.
(4) Where the court makes an order under subsection (2)(a), the court may specify a corporation by name or by reference to a relationship with any other corporation.
(5) Where the court makes an order under subsection (2)(a), the order shall be filed by the court with the Registrar of Companies, as soon as reasonably practicable after it is made.
(6) Where the court makes an order under subsection (2)(b), the Commission may notify any licensed person or registered institution of the order in such manner as it considers appropriate.
(7) A person commits an offence if he fails to comply with an order made under subsection (2)(a) or (b) and is liable-
(a) on conviction on indictment to a fine of $1000000 and to imprisonment for 2 years; or
(b) on summary conviction to a fine at level 6 and to imprisonment for 6 months.
Section: 304 Heading: Transactions relating to contravention of Divisions 2 to 4 not void or voidable Version Date: 01/04/2003
A transaction is not void or voidable by reason only that a contravention of any of the provisions of Divisions 2 to 4 has taken place in relation to or as a result of it.
Section: 305 Heading: Civil liability for contravention of this Part Version Date: 01/04/2003
(1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), a person who contravenes any of the provisions of Divisions 2 to 4 shall, whether or not he also incurs any other liability (whether under section 303 or otherwise), be liable to pay compensation by way of damages to any other person for any pecuniary loss sustained by the other person as a result of the contravention, whether or not the loss arises from the other person having entered into a transaction or dealing at a price affected by the contravention.
(2) No person shall be liable to pay compensation under subsection (1) unless it is fair, just and reasonable in the circumstances of the case that he should be so liable.
(3) A defence under this Part to a charge for an offence in respect of a contravention of any of the provisions of Divisions 2 to 4 shall also be a defence in an action brought under subsection (1) in respect of the same contravention.
(4) A person may bring an action under subsection (1) in respect of a contravention of any of the provisions of Divisions 2 to 4 even though the person against whom the action is brought has not been charged with or convicted of an offence by reason of the contravention.
(5) For the avoidance of doubt, where a court has jurisdiction to determine an action brought under subsection (1), it may, where it is, apart from this section, within its jurisdiction to entertain an application for an injunction, grant an injunction in addition to, or in substitution for, damages, on such terms and conditions as it considers appropriate.
(6) Without prejudice to section 62 of the Evidence Ordinance (Cap 8), in an action brought under subsection (1)-
(a) the fact that there is a determination by the Market Misconduct Tribunal pursuant to section 252(3)(a) that market misconduct has taken place;
(b) the fact that there is a determination by the Market Misconduct Tribunal pursuant to section 252(3)(b) identifying a person (whether or not a party to the action) as having engaged in market misconduct,
shall, in so far the determination is still subsisting, be admissible in evidence for the purpose of proving, where to do so is relevant to any issue in the action-
(i) in the case of a determination referred to in paragraph (a), that the market misconduct has taken place; or
(ii) in the case of a determination referred to in paragraph (b), that the person has engaged in market misconduct.
(7) In an action brought under subsection (1), where the fact that there is a determination referred to in subsection (6)(a) or (b) is admissible in evidence under subsection (6)-
(a) then-
(i) in the case of a determination referred to in subsection (6)(a), the market misconduct that is the subject of the determination shall, unless the contrary is proved, be taken to have taken place; or
(ii) in the case of a determination referred to in subsection (6)(b), the person that is the subject of the determination shall, unless the contrary is proved, be taken to have engaged in market misconduct; and
(b) without prejudice to the reception of any other admissible evidence as evidence of the determination or for the purpose of identifying the facts on which the determination was based, the contents of a report of the Market Misconduct Tribunal containing the determination and published under section 262(2)(b)(i), or the contents of a copy of a report of the Market Misconduct Tribunal containing the determination and made available under subsection (8), shall also be admissible in evidence for such purpose.
(8) Where in an action brought under subsection (1)-
(a) the fact that there is a determination referred to in subsection (6)(a) or (b) is admissible in evidence under subsection (6); and
(b) a report of the Market Misconduct Tribunal containing the determination has not been published under section 262(2)(b)(i),
the court having jurisdiction to determine the action may, where it considers appropriate, require that a copy of the report be made available to the court to enable it to be used for the purposes of subsection (7)(b), whereupon-
(i) the Market Misconduct Tribunal shall cause a copy of the report to be made available to the court to enable it to be used for the purposes of subsection (7)(b); and
(ii) the contents of the report shall be admissible for the purpose specified in subsection (7)(b).
(9) In this section, a reference to a transaction includes an offer and an invitation (however expressed).
(10) Nothing in this section affects, limits or diminishes any rights conferred on a person, or any liabilities a person may incur, under the common law or any other enactment.
Section: 306 Heading: Conduct not to constitute offences Version Date: 01/04/2003
(1) Notwithstanding anything in this Part, where a person is charged with an offence under this Part (other than section 300 or 302) by reason of any conduct, it is a defence to the charge for the person to prove that the conduct is, according to the rules made under subsection (2), not to be regarded as constituting an offence.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the Commission, after consultation with the Financial Secretary, may, where it considers it is in the public interest to do so, make rules to prescribe the circumstances in which any conduct that would otherwise constitute an offence under this Part (other than section 300 or 302) shall not be regarded as constituting such an offence.
(3) Notwithstanding anything in this Part, where-
(a) a person is charged with an offence under section 295, 296 or 299 by reason of any conduct; and
(b) the person is charged on the basis that the conduct was carried out not in respect of securities or futures contracts traded on a relevant recognized market or by means of authorized automated trading services, but in respect of securities or futures contracts traded on a relevant overseas market,
the person shall not be convicted of the offence unless the prosecution proves that in any place in which such relevant overseas market is situated the conduct would have constituted a criminal offence had it been carried out there.
Section: 307 Heading: No further proceedings after Part XIII market misconduct proceedings Version Date: 01/04/2003
Notwithstanding anything in this Part, no criminal proceedings may be instituted against any person under this Part in respect of any conduct if-
(a) proceedings have previously been instituted against the person under section 252 in respect of the same conduct; and
(b) (i) those proceedings remain pending; or
(ii) by reason of the previous institution of those proceedings, no proceedings may again be lawfully instituted against that person under section 252 in respect of the same conduct.