Archaeology and myth

        When we had understood after this section of literature important meaning, why only will then awaken the Chinese ancients in "Shan Hai Jing · Within the four seas West longitude", "West the Time Three Passes through", "North Overseas after", "Serious famine North after", "the Shangshu · yu Tribute", "Solemn Emperor Biography", "Lushih Chunchiu · Asks others for help", "Zhuang-zi", "Luoshui", "Shangshu Ancient armillary sphere Bell", "Wen Yaogou", "Shihchi · Xia Ben the Discipline", "Huai Nan Zi · Terrain Teaches", "Water after Note · River water", "The Shan Hai Jing poem or inscription written on a painting", "Liangzhou Foreign matter Will" and so on several classical literature talks endlessly, repeated emphasis legendary emperor yu the construction's mausoleum calls: “accumulates the rocky mountain”! Originally this is teaches the Chinese not to forget that the Xia Dynasty, do not need to forget the ancestor, do not want to forget the hometown! Because of , but this kind thinks of the ancient exquisite feeling, is spreading in China historical document! In China's youth blood flow! Flow! Until throughout the ages! Straight to forever!
        We saw, “accumulates the rocky mountain” “accumulates the stone”, simultaneously, is called in Egyptian there: “Giza”, in writes in "Sumeier King Table": “Jishen”. But “accumulates the stone” one “Giza” one “Jishen” three, actually the significance is identical, that refers to the big like mountain Pyramid's ancient name which legendary emperor yu - - the Hu husband constructs. Because "Shan Hai Jing" and "Poetry" said that the legendary emperor yu is: “military person”. But “the military person” this censures the Italian word, namely “Hu husband” the sound teaches, or standard transliteration. Therefore “the military person” namely “the Hu husband”, “accumulates the rocky mountain” namely “Pyramid”. this revealed the Chinese Xia Dynasty history and the Egyptian Pyramid's secret! In addition, we may also from “accumulate the rocky mountain”, on this name saw that it ten fractal elephant's reflection Egypt Pyramid the characteristic which piled up by a megalith.
       But this inscribes in the Chinese at heart, symbolizes the hometown! Symbolizes the ancestor! Symbolizes Xia Dynasty's great historical relics! It is not only worth Chinese forever commemorating! The Egyptian forever commemorates, the babylonian forever commemorates, actually it is worth the entire humanity forever commemorating! Because it is the Chinese, Egyptian and the human, the babylonian, as well as entire humanity's common ancestral grave! Therefore, Egyptian Chinese babylonians have the same name and record to carry. Although uses the character to be different, but its sound its Italy is actually same. This is in the linguistics and the exegesis of ancient texts sound teaches, transliterates the principle!

But a more important evidence is, "Shihchi · Five emperors This Discipline" has “north Yellow Emperor by the meat gruel”. Says from the linguistics and the exegesis of ancient texts, “meat the gruel” not is “Egypt” the sound teaches, or the standard transliterates? Simultaneously I also discovered that "Shihchi · Qin Ben Ji ·zhou This Discipline" has recorded “pledge Tianjin” and “cogon grass Tianjin” two. What meaning but “is pledge Tianjin”? Actually “pledge Tianjin” is Zhou Wenwang and the numerous feudal lords forms an alliance the counter-Yin in here, but , “Tianjin” is “Beijing” the unison false character, refers to the capital, therefore “pledge Tianjin” is the Egyptian ancient capital “Memphis” ancient name. What meaning but “cogon grass Tianjin” is also? Actually this is because Emperor Xia opposite constructs in Memphis the Pyramid point cogon grass acquires fame equally likely. But yu how the dynasty name “the summer” also does is come? Actually it is because nearby the national capital constructs many big like mountain Pyramid buildings to acquire fame.
      Thus it can be seen, China historical document carries the fact, demonstrates underneath on point's image with the Egyptian Pyramid, by a megalith stack, but becomes characteristic, as well as Sino-Egyptian same thing, even Pyramid master's name, but also has dynasty name of the Xia Dynasty origin, 11 tallied.because Hu husband Pyramid namely "Shan Hai Jing" records yu “accumulates the rocky mountain”, this historical evidence is reflected by the Sino-Egyptian literature cultural relic the card, this full explanation "Shan Hai Jing" the accurate writing time is 2600 B.C. between 12,500 years, writes the place is in the Egyptian Memphis, writing the primary coverage is records the Egyptian Pyramid to construct in the world geography Africa, the writing nature is mainly records Xia Dynasty ancient emperor to construct, the decoration, to protect and burying in the mausoleum “buries in Pyramid emperor passes through”.
              Below, we discuss "the Book of Changes" again. It is the book which writes in there? When writes? What thing records the ancient book? must explain these questions correctly, we must find a cultural relic to take the weight the standard. I discovered through 20 year research that "the Book of Changes" the primary coverage, is actually yu and constructs with China Emperor Xia with Taikang's life experience in Egypt's Pyramid emperor the mausoleum explains the matter, and has the sacrifice to mourn ancient Emperor deceased person's soul the nature. Why so regards this question? What matter witness has to serve as evidence? We knew that "the Book of Changes" has two famous ancient charts, named: “river chart Luo river book”. But actually are these two charts what thing chart? Actually, it is the Chinese legendary emperor yu and Taikang constructs at national capital Meng Philippines Si's opposite Pyramid, as well as two emperor's clan public cemetery three-dimensional vertical view.
       Therefore through to "Shan Hai Jing" and "Book of Changes" deep research, not only may discover that two ancient book accurate writing time, the place, natural the nature and the content are the same, what most Guan Jian is, we might also through to these two ancient book deep research, find Chinese's root and the hometown in Egypt's fact, discovered that the Egyptian Pyramid was Chinese ancient emperor emperor the mausoleum, the Egyptian antiquity civilization is the Chinese ancients creates, as well as the Chinese culture was many historical evidence which from Egyptian and the origin, the migration came!

              But about this fact, palace jade sea gentleman in 1995 in a book said in "Shan Hai Jing And Riddle of the World culture": "Shan Hai Jing" has recorded the Egypt Pyramid, Pyramid is Da Yu constructs. Afterward Mr. Chen Xuanhong also had the same view. But it is a pity, pairs gentleman “the Chinese culture native place is originned Sima Qian's said” the influence is too deep, therefore said at the same time yu has constructed Pyramid, in addition also said at the same time the Egyptian culture is spreads from China to go. This made the essentials inverts! in 1996 the Beijing University and "Technical Brain truster" the magazine company set up easily to study the topic-based group, has published the topic is "Riddle of the River Chart · Luo river Book · Book of Changes And a Pyramid - - Eternity Important breakthrough Advancement" the lengthy report, the content said: The Eight Diagrams, river chart Luo river the book and the Egyptian Pyramid have the high corresponding unification relations. This inconceivable conclusion, is very correct! But it is said that their research the method is “the river chart Luo river book” and “64 ancient divination symbols”, the direct three-dimensional, the digitization, then which creates through the computation look like Pyramid very much the three-dimensional model. What what a pity is, their research technique has the very major problem, cannot confirm for the easy educational world and accept.
           Is worth mentioning what in this research is cork rather gentleman, he in "“Shan Hai Jing” Tests" in an article viewpoint is: Some people thought that Chinese the civilization has come under two river basin civilization influence, but had not thought that was precisely the Chinese ancients founded two river basins and the ancient Egypt's civilization.
          "the Shan Hai Jing · 18th Volume · Within the four seas after" clear is writing, we “within the four seas” in ancient Egypt. Regardless of being yellow Emperor, Yan Di, Lady Wa, altogether labor, Zhuanxu, regardless of is also Yao, Shun, yu and so on, their spheres of action have achieved the world, Their center in the ancient Egyptian area, some kings buries in there.
      

           Regarding this analyzes the Chinese antiquity history profoundly and "Shan Hai Jing" opinion, I believed that is worth the academic circle taking seriously and commending, because his not only perception and the inspiration are very good, the key was his conclusion pertinent had pointed out the Chinese antiquity history stemmed from Egypt's truth! But unfortunately, he has not studied the Egyptian cultural relic and the ancient writing, thus its conclusion lacks the Egyptian cultural relic and the ancient writing proof. In addition, but also some are worth mentioning the scholar, that is Wuhan Steel Corporation Party school's Mr. Hu Yuan huge mythical bird, he will write "“Shan Hai Jing” in 1993 And Research" in an article once studied wise foresight the final outcome which to "Shan Hai Jing" must “initiate universal history the revolution and even repairs the universal history”. The article said:
         "Shan Hai Jing" the research, passes through how many generation of person's endeavor, to today, demonstrated more and more its important meaning, that is, not only "Shan Hai Jing" may prove the Chinese antiquity history the development, the geography evolution, the writing development, myth production and so on, Moreover, through further thorough research, the newest research results indicated that it may also prove the world history the beginning, the world place Principle vicissitudes, world writing evolution, world religion source and so on. Not only plainly speaking, "Shan Hai Jing" is one records China Antiquity time historical geography and history various aspects situation book, moreover is a record world antiquity time historical geography and history various aspects situation work. "Shan Hai Jing" studies the final achievement, it will perhaps initiate universal history the revolution and even repairs the universal history.
         It can be said that his this prediction is very scientific, the very valuable penetrating judgment! But, his intelligence slightly is it is a pity inferior, not through to "Shan Hai Jing" the research discovered that the Chinese history stems from Egypt's historical evidence! We also saw that has the similarly important meaning prediction, after is 11 year , namely in 2004, studied "Holy Bible" by Soviet three gentlemen discovered that the Chinese culture was moves from Egypt and West Asia comes. According to this discovery, her in "to East to East to East - - “Holy Bible” with Summer Shangzhou Civilization Origin a book “the preface” is Again" explains her prediction like this and studies the fruit:
      Today we live in one very lucky time, it widens our field of vision unceasingly, enables our rest of the year to be possible to know To more God that beautiful marvelous creation secret. But simultaneously we are also regrettable, several hundred year ago question mark still hangs in each person At heart: Who am I? Do I come from where? Where will I arrive at to go? These questions not only belong to the biology, moreover belongs to the geography sum History. After understood relatively humanity's geographical position, I must say that our related human history's knowledge is superficial and we This time is so does not match. Many absurd wrong information flood in ours society, the very few part possibly is intentionally artificial , But the overwhelming majority absurd and wrong is but, because the history needs the archaeology material, the history needs the literature, but the humanity has Much less won't the language time actually by far short in the human survival's time, who be all people have leaves behind the record custom - - to know Says their use? Regardless of therefore what kind of high tech in fact helplessly in an ideal historic information collection. This Is difficult problem which we have faced. But is also precisely because of this challenge, it only then leaves our present generation opportunity: Historical big discovery Very possible to appear in this century. The technical condition and the unprecedented social opening, as well as the human overall's archaeology accumulation, gives me Has created the historical big discovery convenient condition, the history new ball game, if when isn't today can be! As for the reader, needs Wants is only initially the humanity acknowledged “heliocentric theory” the substitution “the geocentric theory” the brain extreme turn.
         We from these representatives in the time strongest voice's outstanding scholar's viewpoint saw that in studies "Shan Hai Jing", "the Book of Changes" and "Holy Bible" in the regulation, scholars how many had discovered these classical literature carry the true meaning, namely with the Egyptian history with Pyramid related, stems from with the Chinese culture the Egypt's historical evidence to concern. Through to these literature research, not only may give the history educational world to develop one to study the Chinese antiquity history culture the new mentality, , and gave back to the history educational world to propose “Chinese culture Egypt originned said” the major issue. Not only therefore studies "Shan Hai Jing", "the Book of Changes" and "Holy Bible" may liberate our thought and academic, most Guan Jian is we may through to these most ancient ancient book research, found China and the humanity culture stems from Egypt's root! Therefore the people discover and predicted that to "Shan Hai Jing", "Book of Changes" and "Holy Bible" the deep research must however initiate universal history the revolution, and even repairs the universal history! This is very accurate, is very scientific, the wisdom prediction! May also say that this is the historical scientific progress necessity, is the new generation historian surmounts ancient's manifesto! What but is worth us rejoicing, these predictions they send the table two years and 13 years later, is written by me "World Antiquity History Revolution" the collection confirmed!
        But very it is a pity, for 20 years, I after using the Sino-Egyptian literature cultural relic carries on compares the research repeatedly, actually accidental discovered that German national studies Kiel assorted and "the Chinese Descriptive note" raised in 1654 in "Egyptian Fan Solution": “Chinese culture Egypt originned said that” was objective the truth; before 2100, Sima Qian raised “the Chinese culture native place in "Shihchi" to origin said that” was the subjective error! That is, China and in the world antiquity history many “the conclusion”, is actually wrong, is must overthrow the recomposition!

            I herewith offer Salute Zhao strives to improve on June 6, 2008 in Nanchang
        Egyptian incumbent culture minister said that fan of the Pyramid will be untied in China, his viewpoint is correct.
        Your research way is correct.
         Wants to watch the picture. Otherwise has the farfetched suspicion.
          Astonishing discovery! No, is the earthshaking discovery!

            (one)
         We knew that "Shihchi" is one studies the Chinese antiquity history essential great work. However, the people actually did not know that "History Records" simultaneously is also a fan China historian looks like the opium illusion equally to be likely wrong but actually the great work very much. Because of "Shihchi" the antiquity part, very wrong has transplanted the Chinese antiquity historical geography and history, caused the posterity to fall into the individually uncorrectable wrong mire! Therefore we could not one point be two regarding this great work until now, cannot correct know the Chinese history the origin question.
                Because before "Shihchi" is two millenniums, Sima Qian many real historical document string in the same place, reconciles again with his subjective suspicion produces the thing, therefore its content to wrong half-and-half, the genuine and fake unite, both has the truth glory, and has the error sludge, this is called me to approve does not endure, does not approve , the Chinese antiquity history is unable the correct research, between the principle of righteousness and the section, I rather receives the human to accuse, is also not willing tens of thousands of the historian to rush blindly with Sima Qian on the blind alley. Because scholar, once has stepped onto the blind alley which Sima Qian guides, that without doubt wastes the youth! Wastes the fund! Waste life! Without doubt will harm the normal history research, the harm scientific enterprise's development, the harm truth image. Because these manage by, I rather offend Sima Qian, offends him the adorer, is also not willing to offend the science, offends the fact, offends the conscience. Therefore we should take objective the fair realistic manner: Takes its essence, abandoned its dregs, the critique inherits the Chinese ancient times's this rare cultural heritage!
              But it is a pity, some historian looks like the reverent religious believer, a their as if muscle, only then one kind goes straight there and comes straight back the thought that understands a Sima Qian great aspect merely the fact, but did not know that his on the other hand commit has many grave mistake facts! Therefore historian different mouth simultaneous Sima Qian is great, actually did not have a scholar saying that "Shihchi" had the grave mistake! About this point, we now "Shihchi's Article the Excavation" collects from prince to the numerous family's viewpoint may see that the people said: "Shihchi" “the penetration classics and commentaries, the galloping ancient and modern”, “its petition swings, has the wonderful gas”, “the depth in "Poem", article of the eternity”, “"the Five Classics" the bag or sack yue, leader of the group history”, “pinnacle of poetic creation of the historian, non-rhyme "Will leave Show"”, will be Chinese history recognition great classics!

             (two)
         However the question came out, since the numerous families blow give an exaggerated account of things "Shihchi", wonderful, but why do we hold this great literature actually could not solve in the Chinese antiquity history actual problem? Why couldn't the archaeologist find Yellow Emperor who in China "Shihchi" is clear about the record to the Xia Dynasty conclusive matter witness? Why in China “pledge Tianjin (cogon grass Tianjin)”, “Bo”, “pickaxe Beijing”, “the Luo Yi” couldn't find Yellow Emperor to the Chou Dynasty, this since 2700 a 330 ancient emperors' genuine mausoleum? Why China will present Hu Shi, Gu Jiegang, Qian Xuantong to be like this firm denies Chinese the antiquity history to doubt the ancient scientist? Why do we also want to do “the Chinese culture now to seek the source or origin the project” and “seek for the Yellow Emperor project”?
           So long as we think these questions, will discover, this will be exactly holds the people will say “as pretty as a flower” "Shihchi" the viewpoint, did not solve the China antiquity question. Therefore the academic circle only will then appear denies the Chinese antiquity history the opposition school of thought - - to doubt the ancient school of thought and the myth scientist. had this kind of irreconcilable incisive contradictory existence, the academic circle also has dodged really again has gone, this compelled Our country Government to decide to start “two a project”, anew studied and solves in Chinese antiquity history these basic questions. If these basic questions do not solve, then archaeologist discovered that a Chinese antiquity history new material, historian on passive revision one time formerly “conclusion”, the repeated revision have been many, the people discovered that we formerly many “the conclusion” was not real, the original revision also was only one kind of headache medicine head, the foot painful medicine foot, could not solve the question power from basic to move to the idea. Therefore in this confused academic difficult position, our country many men of insight only then longed for that “two projects” can solve to decide in our country history these basic questions!
            For example, Mr. Ge Zhaoguang, in "the Ancient times China Also Had How many Mysteries" in an article pointed out:
           Because unearthed Jan Boyi the nationality, causes the Qing Dynasty higher textual criticism the proof method and the modern times doubts the ancient ideological trend the history achievement association its principle Has received the severe interrogation, caused us the ancient times China thought prospect which came from “the conclusion” to have the crack, let us be heavy New thinking ancient times Chinese civilization.

          Through Jan Boyi Ji Dui ancient times China's understanding again, now is a beginning, because here demonstrated new ancient times world Is really very strange is also very deep and broad. Our country ancient times history of learning, because these Jan Bo discovery causes already became “the conclusion” the ancient history department The series ground near disintegrates time and time again with rewrites.
          Mr. Wang Yuzhe "Ancient times History in a book pointed out in China":
       Especially pre-Qin history, as a result of historical data incomplete, steadfast, conforms with the objective truth the conclusion is not many, mostly is one kind of The temporary view, or is one kind “the hypothesis”, because has some everybody to think for a long time indestructibly, unbreakable view, To afterward, as a result of the new material's discovery, actually one each one was substituted by the new conclusion.
      Mr. Ji Xianlin in "Historical studies Break Thought that" in an article also said:
   I from thought that is half historical studies worker. For 50 years, have read many historical works, oneself also carry on some to study With discussion. But to today ......Actually suddenly looked like an elementary student to suddenly see the light equally, has known in a historical studies basis Question: History, specially in ancient history research many conclusions, no matter seems how conclusive reliable, actually can only be the temporary vacation Supposes, is extremely far with the true conclusion close.
           Mr. Ye Shuxian in "Native place Principle And Globalization Knew to Culture Latent Restriction" in an article pointed out:
          (history) not easy elephant natural sciences such ......Objective and fair. As a result of humanity research results non-experimental nature, non-quantification The limitation, afterward researcher carried on the examination which not easily from the science significance to predecessor's theory viewpoint the confirmation or attested to falsity, this was The subjective capriciousness extrapolation and the imagination galloped have provided the broad leeway. That kind of a clamor of different opinions, is unable to agree the aspect became In humanities research common difficult position ......This is the humanities, social sciences research lacks the standard and the objective test limitation is.

            (three)
         We from Ge Zhaoguang, Wang Yuzhe, Ji Xianlin, Ye Shuxian, in these famous scholar's words the regret saw that "Chinese Antiquity History" in many “the conclusion” and “the principle”, looks like the aquatic duckweed to be the same actually, changes frequently along with archaeological discovery's cultural relic, does not have the steadfast objective truth existence! We must know that these words Italy in fact already told us, so-called "Chinese Antiquity History", is actually one is bad, not real, is very very unscientific, “the close is extremely far” to the objective truth the knowledge!
          Therefore the people wanted to ask, why this knowledge will do so bad? Its question root in there? According to Ye Shuxian analyzed said: this is because "Chinese Antiquity History" lacks “the experiment” and “the quantification”, cannot “the confirmation or attests to falsity the examination”, “this for subjectively Italy's extrapolation and the imagination galloped along with the has provided the broad leeway”. Therefore the academic circle has had “a clamor of different opinions, is unable to agree” chaotic “difficult position”, but must break this kind of confusion, confused and the unscientific aspect, must establish one kind “the standard objective standard”!
         Obviously Ye Shuxian these words are correct! But the question has come, what is this examination history to wrong “the fiducial mark survey”? Ye Mr. has not had said that this wants us to think. I believed that in the antiquity history research, the examination truth's standard, that is Wang Guowei proposes “double the evidence act”! No matter this law the history theory is who raises, also, no matter it has how many people to support, so long as his theory has tallying literature cultural relic to prove, that is a truth, otherwise is the fallacy. Because must be clear the antiquity question narration, only has the elephant “the series chart” such figure above as follows, the link link threads up, can carry on quite examines, can be pertinent, clear. This research technique, can break truly contributes no work but be undetected because of others study , indulges in flights of fancy, blowing own horn which talks nonsense, deceives oneself and others, enables our history research to have an approximate standard and the unification standard.
            After having this standard, we use this standard to weigh "Shihchi" again, suddenly will discover that this once was called by wonderful “to be great”, actually also can only result in 50 points! Why said its half pair? Because of it only then half evidence, that is a literature; Also has half the evidence, the cultural relic in there? Sima Qian has not presented evidence. That is, "Shihchi" is follows a model, the historical data which collects according to the time along the foreword copies in a book, polishes the again ancient book. But the key is, is each kind of different ancient book, actually writes in there, has recorded there round of the fresh matter? He does not divide the good and bad, depending on the imagination all thought that is China which rules in Martial emperor of Han dynasty, this place occurs history! Sima Qian's this view, to be whether correct? This is we must complete today “confirmed” or “attests to falsity” “examination” work.

          (four)
          For 22 years, I already pressed "Shihchi" propose “the Chinese culture native place to origin said that” sought for “the Yan and Huang” in China matter witness, when did not have the fruitafter ; I “Chinese culture Egypt originned according to Kiel assorted said that” sought for “the Yan and Huang” to the Egyptian material in matter witness. As soon as the pro and con two law use, this on the heaven-sent opportunity, with negative thinking's method, has found many “the Yan and Huang” in the Egyptian material matter witness. This has proven in China old calendar the history question, the key is Sima Qian "Shihchi" question. Because Sima Qian studies time the Chinese antiquity question, violated has transplanted the historical geography and history wrong to harm, he used the sole literature material, added the intelligent ability and wisdom, fabricated one “the Chinese culture native place to origin says”, causes which his later two millenniums came the all previous dynasties China historians in his wrong thinking to spin, until now is inescapably involved. Therefore the people wanted to ask, what evidence did you have to be possible to prove to be bright he this false idea?
      Because Sima Qian said explicitly in "Shihchi · Five emperors This Discipline":
   Scholar multi-name five emperors, still. since "Shangshu" has carried Yao alone, but "Hundred" word Yellow Emperor, its article is not elegant, recommends gentry Mr. Difficult word it. Kong Zi passes on "Butchers Gives Asked that Five emperors Germany" and "Emperor Is Surname" the Confucian scholar or does not pass on. Yu Changxi to spatial tung oil tree, north Zhuolu, east Gradually in the sea, south floats Jiangsu and Anhui, to the elder all each often said that place of Yellow Emperor, Yao, the Shun, the wind teaches differently firmly, in brief does not leave the classical Chinese literature to be near Yes. Gives the view "Spring and Autumn Period", "National language", it invents "Five emperors Germany", "Emperor Is Surname" the chapter, Gu Difu tests deeply, its shows sees All not empty. The book lacks has, its yi was sees at times in him said. Non-thinks deeply easy to learn, knows in the heart its Italy, presses the humble opinion ill-informed road firmly. Yu Bing discusses the time, selects its word You Yazhe, therefore for this discipline beginning.