Archaeology and myth

            (five)
        Now we through study this section of historical data to know that Sima Qian produced “the Chinese culture native place to origin said” the source of error was, he read the ancient bookafter , inspected China's local human sentiment which many times Martial emperor of Han dynasty rules, there hears from “the elder”, he tours the place is the place which “Yellow Emperor, Yao, Shun” once lived. This was Sima Qian “round trip various nations” the robber listens to the way to say comes “the Chinese culture native place which origins says” the basis.
       But what is bad, because all previous dynasties historian has with the Sima Qian similar science and the historical knowledge limitation, as well as takes into consideration Sima Qian's great given name the sound, thought that he “the hypothesis” is objective which does not need to confirm “the truth”! Therefore, nobody makes that kind to look that resembles stupidly confirms him “the hypothesis is wrong to ” the work. In this kind only “the extraordinary personality” saying was from the slave thought control, proposed after the foreign scholar “Chinese culture Egypt originned said” , also has not touched causes China historian to ponder Sima Qian “the hypothesis” whether correct. On the contrary, our country also has some scholar blind sound asks for “the foreigner” the correct suspicion.
   We from this section of literature also saw that the limited inspection which in Martial emperor of Han dynasty, Sima Qian relies on the literature evidence unilaterally and he rules China which does, concludes early his three millenniums “Yellow Emperor, Yao, Shun” the hometown within the boundaries of China! But his example lifts the what one sees and hears “the certificate” is actually “the elder said that”, “the wind teaches differently”, “the view week article”, “not to leave the classical Chinese literature nearly is”. Like this some empty impractical refined languages. But depends on these, Sima gives in thought that he “thinks deeply easy to learn, knows in the heart its Italy” the hypothesis “not empty”! On the contrary, Sima Qian actually to these him thought “is not elegant” the historical data “selected” “and” has gotten rid, this caused ancient emperor the real historic information to tamper with by Sima Qian and to delete!
       Because Sima Qian did not understand that "Shangshu", "Five emperors Germany", "Emperor Is Surname", "Spring and Autumn Period", "National language" and so on ancient book non-China ancient in the Chinese ancient book, but is Chinese ancient emperor founds a capital “the foreign country” Egyptian, Jerusalem, the Babylon literature. Therefore Sima Qian did not know, these literature record emperor name, personal name, country's name, geographic name, Shan Ming, Shui Ming, thing famous original manuscript in “foreign country”; Afterward Chinese ancient Emperor moved the capital, these literature and these “foreign country” emperor name, personal name, country's name, geographic name, Shan Ming, Shui Ming, thing also along with migration Chinese belt to China. Therefore, these literature ancient book record's all sorts of China historical event is originally occurs in “the foreign country”.
    

           (six)
      But Sima Qian unclear affair, founds a capital blindly Chinese ancient emperor the literature which “the foreign country” writes, regards the literature which writes in China. Afterward history does not distinguish the right and wrong, all sorts “transplants "Shihchi" the historical geography and history” mistake, regarded the truth to inherit down. Actually faces intriguing the China antiquity question, in Sima Qian that time, the light depending on the literature material, adds the intelligent head is impossible to explain and to solve in truly China the ancient question.
        Because Sima Qian lives that time, also does not have "World History", "World Geography", also does not have "Archaeology" and so on discipline capital the material profits from the comparison. Does not have the modern science and the communication equipment understands the world's the mountains and rivers geography and the cultural relic information. Therefore Sima Qian when studies in China the ancient history, is unable to obtain ancient emperor to leave behind in the hometown - - Egypt's each cultural remains site cultural relic information support. Such Sima gave in sends presently “the Yan and Huang” the hometown in Egypt's historical fact.
   It is a pity, although "Shan Hai Jing" recorded Chinese ancient emperor with the writing to construct the fact which in Egypt the Pyramid mausoleum was buried, and also had Pyramid's atlas which served as contrast. Jin's Tao Yuanming and Guo Pudu has seen these “the chart”; And has also written “the poem or inscription written on a painting”. But since, as a result of historical and the science limitation, Sima Qian's historian, besides has seen “the books” inherited, does not have to see cultural relic - - Egypt gold character Emperor with own eyes tower the mausoleum. Therefore they are treating “the books”, actually cannot read the literature record “the mountain” and “the chart”, is actually China Emperor Xia which constructs in Egypt big like mountain Pyramid Emperor mausoleum Wen Hetu.
   But, as a result of all sorts of historical reason, Sima Qian will be unable "Shan Hai Jing", "the Book of Changes" records and description Egyptian Pyramid “the chart article” and the Pyramid cultural relic carries on quite studies. This caused the ancient times “the extraordinary personality” isolated to suspect in “the books” that could not jump to the concrete real diagnosis in goes, this was unable to spell over the literature, the understanding truth.

          (seven)
        But we and further because "Shan Hai Jing" the Pyramid atlas has last years been lost in Jin, as well as receives Sima Qian “the Chinese culture native place to origin said” wrong influence. The mistake arising out of chance circumstances, will cause the ancient and modern China historians to be unable "Shan Hai Jing", "the Book of Changes" records “the chart article” contacts the comparison with Egyptian and Pyramid to study China's antiquity history. Therefore, we only then difficulty with close truth and discovery truth! But since this has been precisely takes charge of the horse to move all previous dynasties historian to be separated from the cultural relic, the isolation studies the literature, creates regrettable result!
          However how many generation of people are defeated the experience, teaches to warn and to touch makes me to study Africa's cultural relic material from the reverse side, thus discovered that "Shan Hai Jing", "Easy after", "Shihchi" is clear about the record epoch-making symbolic to commemorate Yellow Emperor's historical relics - - “the Kunlun Mountains Tienchu”, “Taiwan of the shaft”, the commemoration queen mother of the west's historical relics - - “12 dwelling places of the immortals”, are discovered in Ethiopia by the archaeologist! Commemoration “war of the Yan and Huang” historical cultural relic - - "Battlefield Palette"; Commemoration “war of the Yellow Emperor Chi You” the historical relics - - "Naer Steps Palette"; The commemoration “Yellow Emperor marries thunder the ancestor” the historical relics - - "Naer Steps Fasces", is discovered in Egypt by the archaeologist! Commemoration “war of the Zhuanxu altogether labor” historical relics -- "Sudanese War Rock painting", is discovered in Sudan by the archaeologist! The commemoration legendary emperor yu, opens, Taikang three emperors "Three Graves" - - Giza three the Pyramid! Is discovered in Egypt by the archaeologist! The commemoration “has Yi Shawang the twelfth branch” the historical relics - - "Seize Cow Chart", the scientist is discovered in South Africa by archaeology . As well as the Chinese inscription on animal bones and tortoise shells bronze inscription's prototype, is studied in Egyptian bottom Beese by us discovers! These conclusive cultural relic evidence without doubt has proven: The Chinese antiquity history is the origin in Ethiopian 11 Kunlun Mountain, then moves Egypt, moves again Israel, moves again to the Babylon, passes through India to move again comes to China!
    Through studies Chinese and foreign these to the literature cultural relic which reflects to discover, if does not have the Chinese antiquity historical document, if has not served as contrast in “the foreign country” the discovery Chinese antiquity historical relics, then we are unable to determine the Chinese antiquity history originates most early in Ethiopia and so on “the foreign country” experience history events is solid! Therefore studies the Chinese antiquity history, lacks literature cultural relic any aspect the material, can have the difficult position which is unable to do it alone, riddle of historical also on, therefore difficult solution!

             (eight)
           This explained that literature cultural relic both, look like “the series chart” truly the chart article, in studies in the question indispensable, has the equally important significance! Certainly, if some people insisted me from literature cultural relic both to say again who was heavy who to be light, I believed that the literature was possibly more important a spot, because the literature could record more auspicious thin somewhat to the history! Therefore the cork rather reads "Shan Hai Jing" can discover that the Chinese antiquity history stems from Egypt's fact, completely manages him is merely suspects according to the literature, serves as contrast deficient matter witness proved that but his suspicion is actually such correctness! Also we read lengthy small saying that definitely might leave the chart to comprehend author's thought that reviewed author's experience, and saw Shan Zhenshui to be really same likely! These fact descriptive text chart can reflect the question compared to the ! But does not need to question that one is originally abundant and elegant, the acme of perfection book, can make one obviously to understand the affair!
              We return to the Chinese antiquity question to come up again, this is, causes Sima Qian to think “the Chinese culture native place origins” what major fault root the source is? I believed that was ancient times's war! Because the war caused the Chinese antiquity history to have four transnational cross continent national capital big the relocation. Like “Yellow Emperor moves Hebei”, “ancient male to move Qi”, “even Wang Dong to move” and “Qin male makes an expedition to the east”. This caused Sima Qian to be far away from “the Yan and Huang” the Emperor ancient time, has been far away from “the Yan and Huang” the ancient emperor's native country, has been far away from “the Yan and Huang” the ancient emperor's cultural relic, therefore he did not know the classical literature record “inflammation yellow” to the summer business history and the cultural relic mainly in Egypt's historical evidence!
           Now on our Egypt literature cultural relic saw that "Shihchi" may also make the one divides into two actually the appraisal, must say it both to have correct one side, simultaneously and has mistake's one side. "Shihchi" the great place is: System's record Yellow Emperor to Han Dynasty, which these three millenniums came the China antiquity history, has preserved the massive precious historical document for us, and from Qin Xiangong founded a capital the Chinese Xianyang to Martial emperor of Han dynasty, this phase of histories recorded to carry correctly, moreover the style was exquisite. These are worth us praising with the respect place! But, Sima Qian Qin Xiangong above Emperor all previous dynasties China ancient in “foreign country” Ethiopia, Egypt, Israel, Babylon found a capital build the mausoleum the history, mistakes entirely in national territory the raw soil long history. This violated has transplanted the historical geography and history the significant errors.
    

                 (nine)
        But Sima Qian's mistake, objective speaking, is not he not diligently, must his wisdom has the question, but in international environment, scientific strip then and under the cultural relic material's limitation, was he at that time the insurmountable mistake! Because Sima Qian lives that time, also does not have "World History", "World Geography", also does not have "Archaeology" and so on discipline material profits from the comparison. Does not have the modern communication equipment to understand the world's the cultural remains site and the cultural relic information. Therefore he is unable to know that ancient emperor leaves behind in hometown - - Ethiopia, Egypt, Israel, in Babylon each cultural remains site the cultural relic material. That is, before under 2100 science and the historic condition, Sima Qian is impossible to complete a cross space and time truly, the transnational, , and lacks matter witness to prove has the completely scientific significance historical works.
           We from are again subjective say, Sima Qian's mistake; first, has received his father's influence; second, he was too proud. He in father under own gradually influencing, the youth is successful since childhood, wants to complete his father not unexpectedly the enterprise, writes one complete and the systematic China historical works. Therefore he was kissing China which with father ruled in Martial emperor of Han dynasty to inspect 20 time, was it may be said that diligent. Then, his confidence fully, not Kong Zi “summer business insufficient positive”, Qu Yuan "Day Asked that" places in the eye. He by reason of self-confident, the wisdom, the rich literature material, the hearsay hearsay and excellent writings the prose writing style finished “the single opinion” - - "Shihchi".
      In "Newspaper, No matter what Peaceful Book" said that he must writes "Shihchi": “investigates when the beauty, passes changing of the ancient and modern, becomes the single opinion” good book. Certainly this is he has the big wisdom, the big writing ability, and made best effort good hope. But has these to be not enough.because before two millenniums, he locates the time both cannot break the national boundary the limit, “the study abroad inspects”, and lacks the cultural relic and the technical material evidence. like this, he will be unable the Sino-Egyptian literature cultural relic to carry on quite studies, nature its academic achievement will be unable to have matter witness support. Therefore he can only the certificate aspect literature extrapolate that past history, this kind did deduce wrong to is also actually unable to obtain the confirmation. Before 2000, he only ground investigates and deals with the law is diligently reads, thought that wrote. But he reads literature whether correct understanding? Whether the idea does conform to the real history? Writes the thing is is otherwise correct? These key questions, are unable in his time to obtain the confirmation! Therefore in historical and under the scientific condition's restriction, he thought that “passes ancient changing of the now”, is helpless! Therefore, he only could rely on the literature historical data unilaterally to add the intelligence and ability to finish "Shihchi".

             (ten)
       But this has opened exactly with the literature material unilaterally, adds the idealist extrapolation, composes the Chinese antiquity history the worst head. Henceforth "Shihchi" harms he later all previous dynasties China historians to spin in his error. That is, Sima Qian in fact misled and has entrapped since 2000 the all previous dynasties China historian.
          Because takes one to have the scientific significance history book, not only need probably narrate the history to be correct, simultaneously, still needs to narrate the country with long history, the ancient capital, ancient Emperor mausoleum in Chinese or the world correct geographical position. If confuses one for the other, transplants the geography, the Chinese antiquity historical geography and history will make that the ox head to horse the mouth, will not change beyond all recognition. But Sima Qian has made exactly this kind of fatal big mistake, first founds a capital Emperor Qin Xiangong above Chinese ancient builds mausoleum in Ethiopian, Egyptian, Jerusalem, Babylon's history, talks into “is locally born in China” the history entirely. This is he “ ” raises “the Chinese culture native place originned says” the wrong strategic point.
      In addition, "Shihchi" also has many supplementary mistakes. Below, I cite several examples to chat these questions again.
    First, Sima Qian has violated a serious deletion massive ancient emperor in "Five emperors This Discipline" the historical mistake. He according to "the National language · Lu Language" cloud: “also system of the husband Saint king offers sacrifice, law Shi Yumin offers sacrifice to it, dies the industrious matter to offer sacrifice to it, offers sacrifice to it by Lao Dingguo, can the imperial plague offer sacrifice to it, can defend the big trouble offers sacrifice to it” the principle, three different dynasty great ancient emperor: Yellow Emperor, Zhuanxu, ku, Yao, Shun, gather in the same place are called: “five emperors”.Emperor although these ancient are real, but he wrong on wrong in deleted other achievement young ancient emperor's historical data, a name does not remain continually, this causes the Chinese wrong to think in that phase of histories only then this “the five emperors”, does not have other ancient emperors. However, I through study the Egyptian antiquity history to discover that the Yellow Emperor, is Egyptian first dynasty first generation of pharaoh Mein actually; Zhuanxu, is Egyptian first dynasty third generation pharaoh Gill actually; ku, is actually Egyptian second dynasty first generation of law heroin peaceful Pu; Yao, is actually the Egyptian third dynasty third generation pharaohs assists; Shun, is actually Egyptian third dynasty the seventh generation of pharaoh is bow-legged. Now the question came out, originally Egyptian these three dynasties altogether have every large or small 34 ancient emperors, but "Shihchi" has only recorded Emperor 5 ancient, but also some 29 ancient emperors “are selected by Sima Qian and” have gotten rid, this greatly reduced China's historical evolution.

           (11)      
          Second, Sima Qian "the Discipline in compiled one in Xia Ben" “the Duke Guan to fight Qin Qiong the story”, Yao, Shun, Gun, yu four people, got so far as to gather hardly the dynasty to relate together for the rulers and the ministers. But he did not know, these four people are the emperors who actually shakes the world, moreover was two different dynasties separates ten to come a generation of emperor, they were impossible to meet, impossible with the dynasty was the official. Can our who think that “the extraordinary personality” will violate this kind preliminarily wrong?!
        
        Third, Sima Qian "the Discipline in said in Xia Ben": “yu is then with the profit, Hou Ji presents emperor to assign, assigns the feudal lord common people to be popular the person by the Fu earth, good mountain table the wood, decides mountain Sichuan. yu the wound father Gun the merit receives the bead inadequately first, outside is the fatigue body languishes, occupies for 13 years, crosses the main house gate not to dare into, thin food and clothing”. this section confuses right and wrong talking nonsense, once caused the Chinese to think that yu is a selflessness, industrious simple, regulates waterways difficultly model emperor! Because this kind harms to lead enables the Chinese to have Canada to yu the admiration! How however is the historic truth also? Actually in this section of literature “the life feudal lord common people are popular the person by the Fu earth, the good mountain marker pole, decides mountain Sichuan”, is yu the life feudal lord and the common people constructs for him “accumulates the rocky mountain”, namely Egyptian Pyramid. This project procedure is this: yu the life person digs a giant gulf in the tomb, uses the megalith again in the pit a build progressive upward contraction Pyramid.when after Pyramid completes, then used ancient times the cement - - “the rest soil” to whitewash the tower surface, then with the gold foil package, the gold, silver and jewelry decoration, dug the channel to direct the river water finally to encircle Pyramid, caused the mausoleum to be located among the great lake. Therefore "Shan Hai Jing · Within the four seas after" cloud: “has nine earthen mounds, by water Luo river it: ......Earthen mound of the military person”. "Within the four seas West longitude" cloud: “Hou Ji buries the mountain, pendular water ring it”. At the same time, this incident Herodotus "Underwent really the History" also has the record, the literature said: after “Qi European Pusi (yu) constructs the mausoleum, but also the water used encircles the mausoleum, the water is canal directs from Nile River in the ”. Also said: “triumphant Puran (opens) does not look like another Pyramid such to have the rivers and creeks to direct Nile River's river water, but is introduces through a manual construction canal the river water; A river water circumferential flow island, but they said that Qi European Pusi then buries on this island”. "History" also criticized yu opens said: “Egypt once had 106 years was in the abyss of suffering ......The people remember when these two kings hates to such the degree, so that they are very not willing to mention their name, but proposes Si's name with the herdsman skin to call these two Pyramid”.
      

                (12)
         Fourth, I said "Ancient rite of making sacrifices Book" again question. Sima Qian to wrong does not divide in this important literature fills many historical data the same place, this not only cannot explain the question, on the contrary, actually causes him to die is not clear “the ancient rite of making sacrifices” is how a matter. Possibly he according to "Zhou guan" the view will struggle to debate, under “the ancient rite of making sacrifices” will be “the emperor offers sacrifice to heaven the famed scenery”. Since actually, this is only one kind of misunderstanding which because the Eastern Zhou Dynasty the geography vicissitude has produced, because this kind misunderstands Chin Shihhuang, Li Si, Martial emperor of Han dynasty, Sima to move the capital runs up to the Shandong Taishan to bow to heaven and earth, offers a sacrifice to the ghosts and gods, asks the good crop weather, the state bumper harvest.because Li Si and Sima Qian such big knowledge at that time did not have the objection to this kind of offering sacrifice to heaven ceremony, afterward also did not have the scholar to raise the question regarding this, therefore this kind of ceremony like this is determined!
         However, “ancient rite of making sacrifices” is actually the historic truth what? Why does the ancient in "Peaceful For the emperor's inspection" collect 10 pages of papers, 42 “seal in the Taishan, imperial sacrifices Yu Liang Fuzhe, 72” historical data? Why "Shan Hai Jing", "Pipe", "does River Chart Record Hook Really", "In Shangshu Marquis", "Ritual Records", "Spring and Autumn Period Chinese including Multiplies", "Filial piety classic Hook Life Definitely", "the Five Classics Passes Righteousness", "Han History", "Continues Han History", "East Observes the Chinese To record", "Standard Slightly", "White tiger Passes Germany To discuss", "Custom Passes Righteousness", "Jin Shu", "Suishu", "Tangshu", "Songshu" or tires of its bothersomely, again and again record this kind of matter not certainly? For correct reply these questions, I concentrated on study for 22 years only then to discover that this ceremony's primitive significance “offered sacrifice to heaven” by no means that but was Chinese ancient emperor under the mausoleum the sacrifice mourns first emperor in Egyptian Pyramid emperor, wanted us not to forget the great ancestor!
   Why “is the ancient rite of making sacrifices” “the ancestor worship”, is not “offers a sacrifice to the mountain”? About this question, I study from "Shan Hai Jing" discovered that here “seals” is the seal and the burying meaning; “the imperial sacrifices” are the meaning which rests. “too” namely “peaceful” unison false character. Therefore “Mt. Taishan” namely “Taishan”; “Liang” refers to “Liangshan”. This point, "Poetry · Han Luan" records very much clearly: “Luan Luan Liangshan, Uygur yu pasture it”. Here “the pasture”, is “constructs” the meaning. Therefore here “Mt. Taishan”, “Taishan”, “Liangshan”, is refers to big like mountain Emperor who Egyptian Pyramid ancient emperor constructs the mausoleum. “the father” refers to the father, also refers to first emperor. “72” are refers to Yellow Emperor to the summer end, this since 1500, Chinese in the history the meritorious service outstanding was greatest 72 ancient emperors who, most was worth the posterity memento. Therefore the entire section historical data's meaning is: Buries and rests in high Emperor big like mountain Pyramid in mausoleum great ancient emperor has 72.

(13)

        In addition, "Ancient rite of making sacrifices Book" also repeatedly recorded said: “between Jiangsu and Anhui, a cogon grass three keel, thinks the affiliation”, “between Jiangsu and Anhui, a cogon grass three keel, is the god affiliation”, “the night sets up on the cogongrass, five benefit general also the clothes feather robe, the night sets up on the cogongrass to print”. But these historical data also the ancestor worship have what relations with ancient emperor? I study the discovery, here “river” by no means our country Yangtze River's river, but is the class jing Egypt Pyramid mausoleum area “Siho”. “Huai” is “the link” the unison false character, non-our country Anhui's Huaihe River, but refers to "Shan Hai Jing" records surrounds Pyramid emperor the mausoleum to protect the mausoleum river. "Shan Hai Jing · Within the four seas after" has “Hou Ji to bury the mountain, pendular water ring it” may prove. Also “cogon grass”, namely analogied an Egyptian Pyramid emperor the mausoleum; “three keels” point to golden character the tower, has nearby three obvious edges and corners. Here “the nationality” is “the mark” the unison false character, refers to the heritage attraction. “the cogongrass”, namely Pyramid emperor who the stone constructs with white lime the mausoleum. “the god” refers to Emperor Xia; “the god nationality” refers to the Pyramid historical site which Emperor Xia constructs.
            What but "Ancient rite of making sacrifices Book" constructs Chinese ancient emperor in Egypt Pyramid and the ancestor worship two matters both records is clear is this section of historical data: “as soon as Taiwan emperor ...... said: The God, the ancestral hall must under the mountain, above the hill, the life say: , Guiyang, offers a sacrifice to must in Ze the round ......All in the Northern Qi Dynasty, and suddenly sea”. This section of short literature's meaning is: Chinese ancient emperor both calls “the Taiwan emperor”, and said that “the God”, his temple must construct at big like mountain Pyramid's, small Pyramid's above, in the destiny is: When auspicious time, constructs in mausoleum area south side; The sacrificial offering emperor certainly is first in lake water middle Emperor Pyramid mausoleum under. But this Pyramid emperor the mausoleum group, constructs in Egypt's northern side, approaches Mediterranean Sea's place!
        But it is a pity, these historic truth because of the change of the seasons, circumstances changes with the time, the native country is remote, the mountains and rivers must, enabled in the Chinese mind already not to have hometown these big like mountain Pyramid emperor the mausoleum shadow. Therefore in the Chinese history is biggest basically, “seals Taishan, imperial sacrifices Liang Fuzhe, 72”, such ancestor worship important matter, “the extraordinary personality” Sima Qian did not know that was any meaning. Therefore Chin Shihhuang, Li Si, Chinese military Emperor , Sima moves the capital runs up to the Shandong Taishan to bow to heaven and earth. In fact, they Shandong's Taishan, have regarded "Shan Hai Jing" and "Pipe" and so on the historical document record “Taishan”. Obviously they have been cheated in here by the same name, has made “takes a seat according to ticket number” the mistake. But in fact “Taishan” refers to the mountain which the Chinese Shandong forms naturally, another “Taishan” refers to Chinese ancient emperor big like mountain Pyramid which constructs in Egypt the imperial tomb. I dared saying that until now China does not have the second historian to understand truly “Taishan” another kind of meaning was refers to our ancestor to construct in Emperor Egypt's Pyramid the mausoleum name!

                  （one)
        The friends, you are good! You finished have accepted the new thought that new scientific, the new truth mental preparation? Below was I studies the 22 year's academic achievement, do not scare by these new things! Abundant host gong marquis you presence and criticism! I study "Shan Hai Jing", "the Book of Changes", "Shangshu", "Poetry" and "Shihchi" and so on Chinese pre-Qin literature had 22 years; At the same time, I also am engaged in the world antiquity historical studies which serves as contrast, and has carried on long-term and the careful comparison research work with the Sino-Egyptian antiquity literature cultural relic and the ancient writing. Thus has discovered many earth-shaking rarely known facts. In these 22 year difficult research and the writings, I completed basically a set is 2,000,000 characters "World Antiquity History Revolution" the series collection writings.
          First: "Opened Big Extinction, Big West Continent, Yellow Emperor Is Riddle of the Egyptian Pharaoh Mein" Second: "Opened yu Accumulates Rocky mountain Is Riddle of the Hu Husband Pyramid" Third: "Opened Chinese History Culture To stem from Riddle of the Egyptian" Fourth: of "Opened Riddle of Kunlun Mountain, the Queen mother of the west" Fifth: "Opened Riddle of the Easter Island Megalith Person" Sixth: "Opens Dragon Is Dinosaur, Dinosaur Until now Riddle of the Existence"
     Today I offensive write this letter to you, was I as early as successfully has completed in the writings at the beginning of the century, Our country Government life Beijing University and Academia Sinica Institute of archaeology united the attack two large-scale academic projects: “the Chinese civilization seeks the source or origin the project” and “seeks for the Yellow Emperor project” the research. Afterward understood you are these two “the academic project” person in charge, therefore takes the liberty to write this letter to you, hoped that can have your support and advise.
       study Chinese and the world antiquity history origin question, the obtained achievement, is conducts the long-term earnest comparison research with the China and Egypt historic information to obtain. This achievement conclusive has proven: The Egyptian antiquity history culture is the historical culture which the Chinese ancients found, the Chinese history culture is the historical culture which moves from Egypt! This has proven: in 1654 German scholar Kiel assorted and "the Chinese Descriptive note" in two books raised “Chinese culture Egypt in "Egyptian Fan Solution" to origin said that” was the truth. At the same time, also had proven Sima Qian raised “the Chinese culture native place in "Shihchi · Five emperors This Discipline" to origin said” was the error. And had also proven Yellow Emperor is Egyptian first generation of pharaoh Mein actually; The Egyptian Pyramid, is actually emperor who China Emperor Xia constructs historical facts and so on mausoleum.